Indirect questions as criticism
Leading or indirect questions are often disguised criticism that can take us by surprise. How to act in such situations? We analyze it below
Are you still with that partner with whom you got along so badly? Are you telling me you haven't quit that job yet? Are you really one of those people who doesn't believe in any philosophy or religion? Tricky or double-headed questions don't really seek to know our answer . When they pose them, what they want is to confuse us or project an underground criticism.
These kinds of fallacious questions often leave us in a disadvantageous position where the need for self-defense instantly arises . We know that whoever asks us these questions does not always do so with a good idea, we are aware that there is a trap in their approach and what they are looking for is that we fall into it.
How to react? How to act in such situations?
Indirect communication and double-meaning questions
We can find tricky or double-headed questions in any of our social settings. It is common, for example, to be raised by coworkers , family members and even some of our friends. However, it is interesting to know that these types of questions can also appear in job interviews.
Asking questions in which double meaning plays with the challenging is one way of evaluating candidates . With this, not only originality in the response is valued, but also the ability to react to uncomfortable situations. It is a mechanism that allows many companies to screen to find a very specific type of personality .
Therefore, every time we come face to face with leading questions or double meaning, it is necessary to previously assess the situation in which we are . Sometimes we will find ourselves before someone looking for a trigger to start a discussion. On the other hand, and if we are in a personnel selection process , it is interesting to know how to act. We analyze it.
Basic strategies to act on leading questions or double meaning
Tricky questions are those in which the interrogator, far from asking us something directly, looks for a convoluted shortcut to provoke us. "Are you still torturing your car or have you already learned to drive?" With this type of formulations, the sender starts taking something for granted (that the person does not know how to drive ) and also seeks to generate an emotional reaction in the receiver.
Studies such as that carried out in the department of psychology at the University of Milan, for example, indicate something remarkable in this regard. This type of indirect communication makes use of irony and conceit as an "elegant" way to emotionally impact the other.
So let's see what strategies we should use:
Reframe the question
Many of the tricky or double-meaning questions start from a presupposition, that is, from ideas, which, being false, are considered valid . For example, when faced with questions such as " Are you still torturing your car?", It is advisable to rethink the idea correctly: "Are you telling me I don't know how to drive?"
Demand direct communication
Double-meaning issues almost always make use of irony and sarcasm. It is a type of indirect and convoluted communication that hurts and leaves no one indifferent. In these situations it is appropriate to demand that if they really want to ask us something, they do so in a direct and respectful way.
Before whom you only seek an emotional reaction, calm
What that issuer expects is to provoke us, therefore, it is advisable to keep calm and not respond disproportionately. Let's use a focused, rational and balanced approach.
Ignore the question for fallacious
"When will you stop cheating on exams? Why do you hate your brother?... ". A good part of these questions stem from fallacious reasoning, from totally false assumptions that it is better to ignore . Thus, for health and psychological balance, it is advisable not to play along.
How to answer double-meaning questions in job interviews?
When a recruiter asks a candidate a series of specific questions, they do so based on a profile they want to search for. Therefore, it is possible that in a job interview, we may find ourselves faced with a battery of questions that border on the double meaning , but without that malicious or critical (captious) nuance.
What should we do?
- First of all, be clear about what position you are applying for and find out about the company you are going to work for . Delve into its values, its trajectory, its policies, its ideals, etc.
- Naturalness and confidence . Assume that double-meaning questions may arise in that interview. It is good that they do not catch you by surprise and that they do not generate a blockage.
- Sincerity and creativity . These types of questions seek two things. The first, to evaluate the temperance of the candidate when it comes to fitting in these types of situations. The second, to see how it unfolds in its response. Therefore, when faced with questions such as "what would you do if we did not have you in this selection process?" , it is good to use sincerity and ingenuity.
- Openness and tranquility . It is true that almost no one delights in trick or double-talk questions. However, in a job interview it is appropriate to show receptivity and that balance of someone who, far from being surprised by the unforeseen, handles them calmly. The attitude is a value in these situations.
To conclude, in our daily lives it is very easy to find ourselves in this type of situation. Knowing how to handle them with ease will make us gain in health and, in addition, we will even improve the image we have of ourselves.
When we reason about a problem, we tend to use a simple and useful outline most of the time. This way of thinking is what is known as linear thinking.
Coercive persuasion is a cognitive mechanism that operates through false beliefs and misconceptions. It leads a victim to think that it is desirable and convenient to perpetuate the bond that he maintains with his aggressor.
In couple relationships there is always a certain degree of commitment and, of course, seeking the company of the person you love. However, some people have an excessive emotional dependence on their partners .